The moderating and mediating role of local government in the community engagement strategy of a renewable energy company in South Africa
Keywords:Renewable energy, corporate community engagement, local government, sustainable development, South Africa
Adopting a qualitative case study approach of a renewable energy company in South Africa, the research investigated community engagement within the tripartite relationship of a wind farm, the communities, and the local government. It was found that local government played a moderating role in the community engagement efforts of the wind farm which had to comply with certain engagement protocols determined by local government. Local government also played a mediating role in corporate community engagement, as the wind farm developed their engagement strategy in alignment with local government’s policies and acted as a ‘dot-connector’ between local government and communities. The wind farm played a reciprocal mediating role on local government’s own engagement with their communities in the face of local government’s inefficiencies and complemented service delivery outcomes. The wind farm’s engagement strategy thus enabled local development which was appreciated by communities and local government.
Alexander, P., C. Runciman, T. Ngwane, B. Moloto, K. Mokgele, and N. Van Staden. 2018. Frequency and Turmoils: South Africa’s Community Protests 2005-2017. South African Crime Quarterly 63: 27-42.
Bowen, F., A. Newenham-Kahindi, and I. Heremans. 2010. When Suits Meet Roots: The Antecedents and Conse-quences of Community Engagement Strategy. Journal of Business Ethics 95: 297-318.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0360-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0360-1
Christensen, H. 2018. Legislating Community Engagement at the Australian Local Government Level. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance 21: 1-30.
Davey, D. 3 April 2020. New Energy Mix on the Cards. Mail & Guardian. https://mg.co.za/special-reports/2020-04-03-new-energy-mix-on-the-cards/.
Delannon, N., E. Raufflet, and S. Baba. 2016. Corporate Community Engagement Strategies and Organizational Ar-rangements: A Multiple Case Study in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production 129: 714-723.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.047
Department of Mineral Resources and Energy South Africa. 2020. Renewable Energy. http://www.energy.gov.za/files/renewables_frame.html.
Eberhard, A. and R. Naude. 2016. The South African Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme: A Review and Lessons Learned. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 27 (43): 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2016/v27i4a1483
Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freudenreich, B., F. Lüdeke-Freund, and S. Schaltegger. 2019. A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Mod-els: Value Creation for Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 166: 3-18.
Hamann, R. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility, Partnerships, and Institutional Change: The Case of Mining Com-panies in South Africa. Natural Resources Forum 28: 278-290.
Helmsing, A. H. J. 2003. Local Economic Development: New Generations of Actors, Policies and Instruments for Afri-ca. Public Administration and Development 23 (1): 67-76.
Moloi, K. C., A. Oksiutycz-Munyawiri, and G. Ndong. 2014. An Investigation of Corporate Social Investment (CSI) Programme’s Contribution to the Brand Image of a Financial Institution in Alexandra, South Africa. Mediterrane-an Journal of Social Sciences 5 (4): 282-291.
IPP Projects. 2020. Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme. https://www.ipp-renewables.co.za/.
Institute of Directors of South Africa. 2016. King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa. https://www.iodsa.co.za/page/AboutKingIV.
Kackartz, U. 2014. Three Basic Methods of Qualitative Text Analysis. Chap. 4 in Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. London: SAGE.
doi: 10.4135/9781446288719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288719
Kim, Y. and N. Darnall. 2015. Business as a Collaborative Partner: Understanding Firms’ Sociopolitical Support for Policy Formation. Public Administration Review 76 (2): 1-12.
Leedy and Ormrod. 2005. Practical Research: Planning and Design. 8th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Liu, G., T. Eng, and W. Ko. 2013. Strategic Direction of Corporate Community Involvement. Journal of Business Ethics 115 (3): 469-487.
Lorenz, C., G. Gentile, and T. Wehner. 2013. Exploring Corporate Community Engagement in Switzerland: Activities, Motivations, and Processes. Business & Society 55 (4): 594-631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313482549
Lumpkin, G. T., and S. Bacq. 2019. Civic Wealth Creation: A New View of Stakeholder Engagement and Societal Im-pact. Academy of Management Perspectives 33 (4): 383-404.
Manchidi, S. 2015. Factors Necessary to Enhance the Effective Implementation of Corporate Social Investment (CSI) in South Africa. PhD. (Business Management)/ M.Com. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Factors%20Necessary%20to%20Enhance%20the%20Effective%20Implementation%20of%20Corporate%20Social%20Investment%20(Csi)%20In%20South%20Africa.pdf.
Mersham, G. M., and C. Skinner. 2016. South Africa’s Bold and Unique Experiment in CSR practice. Society and Busi-ness Review 11 (2): 110-129.
Miraftab, F. 2004. Public-Private Partnerships: The Trojan Horse of Neoliberal Development? Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (1): 89-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04267173
Mujere, J. 2015. Insurgent Citizenship and Patterns of Authority in Mining Affected Areas: Understanding Commu-nity Protests in Rustenberg, South Africa. Labour, Capital and Society 48 (1 and 2): 240-266.
Municipality X local newspaper. 2012. [Online]. [Accessed: 17 August 2020].
Municipality X MEC policy speech. 2016. [Online]. [Accessed: 17 August 2020].
Municipality X Municipal website. 2018. [Online]. [Accessed: 17 August 2020].
Nijhof, A. J. Schaveling, and N. Zalesky. 2019. Business, Society, and the Need for Stewardship Orientation. Journal for Organizational Change 32 (1): 145-163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2017-0348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2017-0348
Rolfe, S. 2016. Divergence in Community Participation Policy: Analysing Localism and Community Empowerment Using a Theory of Change Approach. Local Government Studies 42 (1): 97-118.
doi: 10.1080/03003930.2015.1081848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2015.1081848
Schaffner, J. 2014. Development Economics. USA: Wiley.
Schreier, M. 2018. Sampling and Generalization. In Flick, U. (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection (pp. 84-98). London: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.n6
South African Government. 2020. Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 (Amended). https://www.gov.za/documents/mineral-and-petroleum-resources-development-act?gclid=Cj0KCQjwhb36BRCfARIsAKcXh6FwqhTXRS_pX1bmlSZfHtKyyQpQZGx3o9jQKYiHc8wF95HeT-16urEaApgQEALw_wcB.
Stirling, L., A. Wilson-Prangley, G. Hamilton, and J. Olivier. 2016. Antecedents to Transformational Community En-gagement in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 19 (4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v19i4.1415
Vasstrøm, M. and R. Normann. 2019. The Role of Local Government in Rural Communities: Culture-based Develop-ment Strategies. Local Government Studies 45 (6): 848-868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1590200
Wlokas, H., P. Westoby, and S. Soal. 2017. Learning from the Literature on Community Development for the Imple-mentation of Community Renewals in South Africa. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 28 (1): 35-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2017/v28i1a1592
Worthington, I., D. Patton, and I. Lindley. 2003. Local Authorities, Business and LA21: A Study of East Midlands Sus-tainable Development Partnerships. Local Government Studies 29 (1): 91-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/714004179
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Robinson, Siân Stephens
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright remains with the author(s).
Publishing rights remain with the author(s)
All articles published in JESA can be re-used under the following CC license: CC BY-SA Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.