The Integrated National Electrification Programme and political democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2005/v16i4a3077Keywords:
electrification, policy development, National Electrification Programme, Integrated National Electricity ProgrammeAbstract
Since the coming of democracy in South Africa, the last decade has been marked by extraordinary, yet positive changes in policy development. Democratic organisation, both as a system of government and as a value system commanding the support of ordinary people, is of key importance in these developments and the implications for South Africa are still being analysed. Noticeable are the fundamental changes in the energy sector where there has been a shift from energy self-reliance and energy security to a more sustainable policy approach driven by economic efficiency, social equity and environment protection. Institutes of Democracy like IDEA (2004) concur with this trend that a strong democratic system must support poverty reduction for meaningful democratic change and, in practice; this is clearly the trend being defined. It is now a sustainable development issue, and voter’s confidence that is fast becoming the defining principle and drives for rapid policy change and service delivery in the form of an Integrated National Electrification Programme (INEP) in the energy sector. Policy makers in energy policy acknowledge this phenomenon as defining what is now seen as a ‘post-apartheid energy paradigm shift’. In this paper, it is suggested that the National Electrification Programme (NEP) has performed beyond expectation in increasing access to electricity for the poor in the country. It is also argued that, there is now an electrification and political democracy nexus exhibited in social and political development of this country. In this line of thought, the argument given is that one of the reasons why people voted for the ruling party in 1999 and 2000 was the NEP. Furthermore this identified linkage provides policy recommendations that suggest that the government should deliver other basic services in a similar manner in order to gain people’s confidence. In South Africa, because of the country’s unique social, economic and political history, a trade-off between basic social service delivery and linkage with democracy then becomes very crucial.Keywords
Downloads
References
Cousins, B. (2004) Major Shift in Economy’s Structure and Growth Needed to Address Poverty and Inequality, Cape Times.
DME (2004), 2004-5 MTEF Budget Cycle, report produce by Eskom INEP BPU for DME’s INEP BPU.
Eberhard, A. and Theron, P. (1992) International experience in energy policy research and planning, Elan Press
Hameso, S. (2002) Issues and Dilemmas of Multi-Party Democracy in Africa. West African Review, Vol. 3 ISSN: 15-4488.
Mbeki T, (2004) Letter from the President, ANC Today, www.anc.org.za.
Minerals and Energy (2004), Minister Mlambo Ngcuka to Conduct Electricity Switch-ons.
Olukoshi, A. (2002) Democracy is difficult to build on empty stomachs, Newsletter 15, IDEA, Stockholm, Sweden.
Thom C, et al (2000), Review of South Africa’s Rural Electrification Strategy, Energy and Development Research Centre, University of Cape Town.
Trade Knowledge Network (TKN), (2002), International Trade in Services and Sustainable Development: The Case of Energy and Tourism in South Africa. Edited by Rashad Cassim and Wendy Jackson. Contributing authors: Anton Eberhard (UCT), Rashad Cassim (TIPS), O.A Akinboade (Unisa), E.W. Niedermeier and F. Sibanda (Competition Commission), Paul Roberson (UCT) and Jolene Skordis (UCT).