The Kenyan IPP experience

Authors

  • A Eberhard Graduate School of Business University of Cape Town
  • K Gratwick
  • K Gratwick

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2005/v16i4a3071

Keywords:

Kenya, Independent Power Producers, electricity sector, electricity production, project finance, electricity supply industry

Abstract

Public and concessionary finance for the expansion of power systems in Kenya dwindled in the 1990s. Meanwhile, demand for electricity services was on the rise. Private investment emerged to fill the gap with four Independent Power Producers (IPPs) established in the country by the second half of the decade. From 2000, the private market appears to have collapsed. Expansion of the power sector is once again led by the incumbent state-owned utility. This paper examines the investment and development outcomes of the four IPP projects, and highlights a number of interesting features of this experience. Firstly, the regulator matters. Established after the first wave of IPP developments, the regulator helped to bring tariffs of the second wave down. Secondly, the tendering process (i.e. an international competitive bid) does not ensure competition for a country that has significant political risk. Bidders self select well before the tender begins, a process which led one Kenyan tender to attract only two bidders (one of which was non-compliant). Thirdly, local partners matter. Half of the projects had local partners, and those that did faired better in the long run. The impact of project financing, public perception and currency devaluation is also evaluated to glean lessons learned of past projects and help pave the way for a more sustainable future for the Kenyan power sector—which presently serves only 15% of the population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Electric Power Act 1997, Government of Kenya. No. 11.

IFC 1999, Summary of Project Information: Kipevu II Power Project. Retrieved March 21, 2005 from www.ifc.org.

KenGen 2003, Annual Report, 30 June.

‘KenGen prepares for IPO towards the end of the year’ 2005, Africa Electra, Issue 18.

Kenya 2005, Africa Electra, Issue 19.

Kenya Power & Lighting Company Limited 2004, Annual Report & Accounts 2003-2004.

‘Kenya Risk: Infrastructure Risk’ 2004, Economist Intelligence Unit, March 5.

McEwan, P 2001. ‘IPP Investment in Kenya – an apprais

al’ Power Economist, 1 March.

Private Participation in Infrastructure: Trends in Developing Countries in 1990-2001 2003, The World Bank, Washington DC.

SAD-ELEC 2004, Reform and Restructuring of the Electricity Supply Industry Status Report. SAD-ELEC, Rivonia South Africa.

Sader, F 1999. ‘Attracting Foreign Direct Investment in Infrastructure: Why is it so difficult?’ The World Bank and the International Finance Corporation Foreign Investment Advisory Service Occasional Paper, No. 12.

Victor, D et al 2004, ‘The Experience with Independent Power Projects (IPPs) in Developing Countries: Introduction and Case Study Methods’, Working Paper No. 23. Retrieved November 20, 2004 from http://pesd.stanford.edu/publications/20528/.

World Bank 2004. World Development Indicators.

World Bank 2000. Emergency Power Supply Project, September 14.

Aga Khan Fund for Economic Development: retrieved from http://www.akdn.org/agency/akfed_indpromo.html, on March 28, 2005.

IFC. Summary of Project Information: Kipevu II Power Project, June 25, 1999. Retrieved from www.ifc.org, on March 21, 2005.

International Country Risk Guide: www.ICRGonline.com

World Bank. Emergency Power Supply Project, September 14, 2000. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org, on March 21, 2005.

World Bank PPI database. Retrieved from http://ppi.worldbank.org/ accessed on October 15, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2005-11-01

How to Cite

The Kenyan IPP experience. (2005). Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 16(4), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2005/v16i4a3071