Optimising thermal photovoltaic energy system for green and sustainable energy generation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2017/v28i3a1602Keywords:
optimal output, concentrated thermal photovoltaic system, operating conditions, two-dimensional system, efficiency and power outputAbstract
Electricity generated from a concentrated thermal photovoltaic system can be improved upon for optimum output. This investigation considered the various options of optimising system operation via effective control of the operating conditions. It examined various options of varying the system configurations for optimised system efficiency and power output and at minimum operating costs. The number of mirrors and photovoltaic cells for use in the concentrated thermal photovoltaic system were set at eight as standard for the system operation. This number was varied down and up (from eight to six and then from eight to ten) to study the effects of these variations on the concentrated thermal photovoltaic system efficiency and generated power output. A novel thermal model was built in two dimensions and was used to simulate the thermal performance of the concentrated thermal photovoltaic modules. The parameters used for the materials involved were defined and the appropriate physics applied in the study of various operating conditions that affected the system performance for the two-dimensional system were stated. The results showed that temperature rise was least in the ten mirrors configuration and highest in the six mirrors configuration. The six PV cells-mirrors configuration, however, generated the highest power output of the three different configurations considered. The six PV cells/mirrors configuration utilised the least numbers of mirrors and PV cells out of the three configurations, ultimately translating to reduced-materials cost for the operation. Based on these findings, the choice of the lower number of six mirrors and six PV cells was considered the most economical and, therefore, most desirable.
Downloads
References
Anjali, S., Avasthi, D.V., Tejbir, S. and Durgesh, K. 2014. Design of a thermophotovoltaic system optimised surface radiative and conductive heat flux. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Development 4(4). Available online on http://www.rspublication.com/ijeted/ijeted_index.htm.
COMSOL, AB. 2012. COMSOL multiphysics user’s guide, Version 4.3. Available online at http://www.comsol.com.ed, 22 Version. Viewed June 2015.
COMSOL, AB. 2015. Thermo-photo-voltaic cell, Appli-cation library path: Heat_transfer_module/thermal_radiation/tpv_cell. COMSOL Multiphysics user’s guide, Comsol, Ver-sion 5.1. Available online at: http://www.comsol.com.ed, 22. Viewed June 2015.
Cotal, H., Fetzer, C., Boisvert, J., Kinsey, G., King, R., Hebert, P and Karam, N. 2009. The III–V multijunc-tion solar cells for concentrating photovoltaics. Ener-gy & Environmental Science 2: 174-192.
Dubey, S. and Tiwari, G. 2008. Thermal modeling of a combined system of photovoltaic thermal solar water heater. Solar Energy 82: 602-612.
Greenhut, A. D. 2010. Modeling and analysis of hybrid geothermal-solar thermal energy conversion sys-tems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Hoeven, M. 2014. Solar thermal electricity – technology roadmap. International Energy Agency, 75015 Paris, France. 1-52.
Kuhlmann, B., Aberle, A.G., Hezel, R. and Heiser, G. 2000. Simulation and optimization of metal-insulator-semiconductor inversion-layer silicon solar cells. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 47: 2167–2178.
Luque, A., Sala, G. and Arboiro, J. 1998. Electric and thermal model for non-uniformly illuminated con-centration cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 51: 269-290.
Marcucci, A. and Turton, H. 2011. Solar energy perspec-tives in renewable energy. In Renewable Energy Technologies, ed. Printed in Luxembourg by Impri-merie Centrale: International Energy Agency Publica-tions: 1: 5-288. ISBN 978-92-6412-457-8.
Peter, N., Kabu, O.E., Stephen, K. and Anthony, D. 2015. 3D finite element method modelling and simulation of the temperature of crystalline photovoltaic module. International Journal of Research in Engi-neering and Technology 4(9) 378-384. Available online at http://esatjournals.net/ijret/2015v04/i09/ IJRET20150409070.pdf.
Renno, C. and Petito, F. 2013. Energy analysis of a con-centrating photovoltaic thermal system. Energy Sci-ence and Technology 6(2) : 53-63. DOI:10.3968/j.est.1923847920130602.2618.
Sarhaddi, F., Farahat, S., Ajam, H., Behzadmehr, A. and Adeli, M.M. 2010. An improved thermal and electri-cal model for a solar photovoltaic (PV/T) thermal air collector. Applied Energy, 87(7): 2328–2339. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.01.001.
Singh G.K. 2013. Solar power generation by photovol-taic technology: A review. Energy 53(May):1–13. Available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544213001758.
Steiner, M., Geisz, J.F., Friedman, D.J., Olavarria, W.J., Duda, A. and Moriarty, T.E. 2011. Temperature-dependent measurements of an inverted metamor-phic multijunction solar cell. Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 37th IEEE: 002527-002532.
Tester, J., Dipippo, R., Field, R., Augustine, C., Frey, K. and Thorsteinsson, H. 2008. Utilisation of low-enthalpy geothermal fluids to produce electric pow-er. Final Report Project, 1.
Usama Siddiqui, M., Arif, A.F.M., Kelley, L. and Dubowsky, S. 2012. Three-dimensional thermal modeling of a photovoltaic module under varying conditions. Solar Energy, 86: 2620-2631.
Yahyavi, M., Vaziri, M. and Vadhva, S. 2010. Solar en-ergy in a volume and efficiency in solar power gen-eration. IEEE International Conference proceedings, IRI 2010: 394-399. DOI: 10.1109/IRI.2010.5558900.
Zhang, H.L., Baeyens, J., Degrève, J. and Cacères, G. 2013. Concentrated solar power plants: Review and design methodology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22: 466-481.
.png){kind=spacer}