Assessing the awareness and adoptability of pellet cookstoves for low-income households in Lusaka, Zambia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2021/v32i3a11463Keywords:
charcoal, pellet fuels, sustainable development, improved cook stoves, wood fuelAbstract
Wood fuel, charcoal, and firewood comprise over 70 percent of the national energy consumption in Zambia, as only about 25 percent of the population has access to electricity. Replacing charcoal braziers with cookstoves using sawdust pellets can support sustainable energy provision in urban Zambia while reducing deforestation on the countryside. However, acceptability of pellet cookstoves remains low, while the demand for wood fuel is increasing. The study investigated the acceptability of pellet cookstoves, in view of governmental policies, in the Matero-George compound, Lusaka. Qualitative approaches were applied, and respondents were households, and officers at the Departments of Energy and Forestry, and at Lusaka City Council. Factors shaping the stoves’ acceptability included their convenience, possibility of reusing pellets, their long-term cost advantages, and the perceived health benefits of pellets. The barriers included limited supply of pellets, combustible pellet cookstoves, stove size, maintenance costs, cooking traditions, and government policies for dissemination, sensitisation, and communication about pellet stoves. This study demonstrated that implementation of pellet cookstoves at the local level depends on a multitude of contextual factors, and confirms the need for relevant policy instruments if such energy consumption is to be accepted.
Downloads
References
Atteridge, A., Heneen, M. and Senyagwa, J. 2013. Transforming household energy practices among charcoal users in Lusaka, Zambia: A user-centred approach. Stockholm Environment Institute Working Paper No 2013–04.
Bailis, R., Cowan, A. and Masera, O. 2009. Arresting the killer in the kitchen: The promises and pitfalls of commer-cializing cookstoves. World Development 37: 1694–1705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.03.004
Bailis, R., Drigo, R., Ghilardi, A. and Masera, O. 2015. The carbon footprint of traditional woodfuels. Nature Climate Change 5: 266-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2491
Bailis, R., Wang, Y. T., Drigo, R., Ghilardi, A. and Masera, O. 2017. Getting the numbers right: Revisiting woodfuel sustainability in the developing world. Environmental Research Letters 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa83ed
Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. 2011. Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
DFID [Department for International Development]. 1999. Framework of sustainable livelihoods. Department for In-ternational Development, UK.
Edmondson, D.L., Kern, F., and Rogge, K.S. 2019. The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: To-wards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions. Research Policy 48(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.010
FAO [Food and Agriculture Organisation]. 2017. The charcoal transition: greening the charcoal value chain to mitigate climate change and improve local livelihoods, by J. van Dam. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the Unit-ed Nations.
FAO, 2020a. FAOSTAT- Forestry production and trade. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Na-tions. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO (accessed January 4, 2021)
FAO, 2020b. Global forest resources assessment 2020 - Main report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.
Government of Zambia. 2008. National Energy Policy. Lusaka: Ministry of Energy and Water Development.
Government of Zambia. 2009. National Policy on Environment. Lusaka: National Assembly of Zambia.
Government of Zambia. 2011. Environmental Management Act. Lusaka: National Assembly of Zambia.
Government of Zambia. 2014a. National Forestry Policy. Lusaka: Ministry of Tourism, environment and natural re-sources.
Government of Zambia. 2014b. Energy regulation Act. Lusaka: National Assembly of Zambia.
Government of Zambia. 2015a. Forest Act. Lusaka: National Assembly of Parliament
Government of Zambia. 2015b. National strategy to reduce deforestation and forest degradation. Lusaka: Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources.
Government of Zambia. 2017. National policy on climate change. Lusaka: Policy monitoring and research centres.
Hanif, I. 2018. Energy consumption habits and human health nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25: 21701-21712. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2336-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2336-0
ICLD, 2021. LuMa Sustainable Energy. Visby, Sweden: Swedish International Centre for Local Democracy. https://icld.se/partnership/kp-luma-sustainable-energy/ (accessed January 4, 2021)
IEA 2020a. SDG7: Data and projections. Paris: International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/sdg7-data-and-projections (accessed August 15, 2021)
IEA 2020b. Zambia – Country profile. Paris: International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/countries/zambia (accessed December 15, 2020)
Jagger, P. and Das, I. 2018. Implementation and scale-up of a biomass pellet and improved cookstove enterprise in Rwanda. Energy for Sustainable Development 46: 32-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.005
Johnson, N. G. and Bryden, K. M. 2012. Factors affecting fuelwood consumption in household cookstoves in an isolated rural West African village. Energy 46: 310-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.019
Kachapulula-Mudenda, P., Makashini, L., Malama, A. and Abanda, H., 2018. Review of renewable energy technolo-gies in Zambian households: Capacities and barriers affecting successful deployment. Buildings 8, 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8060077
Kshirsagar, M.P. and Kalamkar, V.R. 2014. A comprehensive review on biomass cookstoves and a systematic ap-proach for modern cookstove design. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 30: 580-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.039
Kulindwa, J., Lokina, R. and Ahlgren, E. O. 2018. Driving forces for households' adoption of improved cooking stoves in rural Tanzania. Energy Strategy Reviews 20: 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.12.005
Lewis, J.J. and Pattanayak, S.K. 2012. Who adopts improved fuels and cookstoves? A systematic review. Environmen-tal Health Perspectives 120: 637-645. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104194
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis – an expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
Peša, I. 2017. Sawdust pellets, micro gasifying cook stoves and charcoal in urban Zambia: Understanding the value chain dynamics of improved stove initiatives. Netherlands: Leiden University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2017.02.010
Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rehfuess, E.A., Puzzolo, E., Stanistreet, D., Pope, D. and Bruce, N.G. 2014. Enablers and barriers to large-scale up-take of improved solid fuel stoves: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect. 122: 120-130. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1306639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306639
Republic of Zambia, 2019. National Energy Policy. Lusaka.
Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. New York, United States: Simon and Schuster.
Ruiz-Mercado, I., Masera, O., Zamora, H., Smith, K.R. 2011. Adoption and sustained use of improved cookstoves. Energy Policy 39: 7557-7566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.028
Seguin, R., Flax, V.L., Jagger, P. 2018. Barriers and facilitators to adoption and use of fuel pellets and improved cookstoves in urban Rwanda. PLOS ONE 13, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203775
Swedish Research Council. 2017. Good Research Practice. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Research Council.
United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. New York: UN Publish-ing.
van Kleef, E., van Trijp, H. C. M., Luning, P. 2005. Consumer research in the early stages of new product develop-ment: A critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference 16(3): 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.05.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.05.012
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Anders Roos, Mukuka Mpundu Mulenga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}